October 28th, 2009
Philadelphia Inq reports:
Party dissenters may vote to allow debate, but not to enact a health plan with a public option.
“I really want to get to yes,” Lieberman said. But unless the public-option language is dropped, he said he would likely align with Republicans to block final passage.
Other party moderates said they remained undecided on the opt-out public plan.
“I’m skeptical about what Sen. Reid has proposed,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu (D., La.). Like Lieberman, she opposes a national, government-run insurance plan that would compete with the private sector. But Landrieu gave Reid slightly more leeway, noting that she would “stay open to a principled compromise.”
Sen. Thomas R. Carper (D., Del.), a Finance Committee member who prefers any public option to be run by a nonprofit board rather than the government, said: “This is not the end. This is not the beginning of the end. This is the end of the beginning.”
The proposed public option has been the main flash point in both the House and Senate as Democrats struggle to pass legislation that would extend coverage to millions of uninsured, ban insurance-industry practices such as denying coverage for preexisting medical conditions, and slow the growth of health-care spending.
Click here to read full article
Leave a Comment